The world has changed a lot since the Cold War. That is indisputable fact (Fact). But in some ways it has not changed. In what ways has it changed? It what ways has it not changed? That’s not the point of this paper. This paper is supposed to be about technology advances since the Cold War. It is specifically about the way TV looks and how it has changed since the Cold War. That’s my point exactly (Travish).
Have you ever been watching TV and they do a flashback? Example: I was watching the NCAA Tournament and they showed a flashback to 1982 when NC State won a NCAA Tournament (TV). But it didn’t LOOK good. Not the way they played, it was the image quality that wasn’t good. I wondered if TV really looked like that back then? Does anyone know if TV really used to look like that? THAT is what this paper is about.
Second of all, I must define the Cold War. There wasn’t snow everywhere like that place in Star Wars, it was called Cold War for a DIFFERENT reason. “The Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted for much of the second half of the 20th century resulted in mutual suspicions, heightened tensions and a series of international incidents that brought the world’s superpowers to the brink of disaster,” (History.com). These incidents included U2 trying to have a concert in Russia, Ivan and Nikita Koloff beating the Rock & Roll Express for the tag team belts, and the death of Apollo Creed. The Cold War was ended when Rocky avenged Apollo’s death and defeated Ivan Drago IN RUSSIA (Rocky IV).
Many scholars believe that this incident is what led to improvements in TV (many scholars). TVs used to be big, deep boxes. Now TVs are flat screens with High Definition. Sometimes the screen isn’t flat, it is curved. Also, TVs are rectangles now, but they used to be squares. A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn’t always a square. TVs now are always rectangles but they are never squares.
Whenever you see a flashback on TV it doesn’t look very good. Except in LOST, then the flashbacks look like normal TV. So it doesn’t always look bad, but it usually does, OK? Another time flashbacks don’t look like TV does today is on WWE Network. In the flashback to the first blood match between Dusty Rhodes and Tully Blanchard it looked bad. But that match was better than any match on WrestleMania 32, so does that mean that worse TV quality equals better matches? Does it mean that since LOST’s flashbacks looked normal it wasn’t a good show. Or is it just that the flashbacks on the rest of TV don’t look good because they got old and dusty?
After all of these questions, I have found the answer. When my dad wanted to play Donkey Kong Country, it looked really bad on the flat screen TV. So he bought one of those old, big, square TVs from the janitor at the library. My dad is a dumb jerk. On the old TV, Donkey Kong Country looks great! A librarian said there are ways to improve this experience on a modern TV by using a converter (gamesradr.com, nintendolife.com). So I say they should have used a converter when they showed the NC State flashback. Those IDIOTS!!
Well fans, there you have it. It all depends on what TV you are watching TV on. If you use a TV from the 80s, those flashbacks will look good. If you are watching on a flat screen, it won’t look good. And if you are watching on a curved screen, then it will just look pitiful. Also, you could use a converter just like if you were playing Super Intendo on a flat screen. That’s all the time we have left, until next time my name is Travish. It will still be Travish until then too. Thank you.